Mazda vs Mitsubishi: Which Is More Reliable?

Mazda Vs Mitsubishi Reliability

In the fiercely competitive automobile industry, a car's dependability is a pivotal aspect that can elevate or mar a brand's reputation.

Mazda and Mitsubishi are two notable Japanese behemoths that have made a notable imprint in the industry. These automakers have skillfully carved out a unique space by presenting a wide array of models catering to diverse consumer preferences.

But which of these automotive powerhouses can be entrusted to produce a vehicle that endures time?

In this article, we will discuss everything you need to know about Mazda vs. Mitsubishi reliability, looking at how each brand measures up regarding this critical aspect of car ownership.

Mazda vs. Mitsubishi Reliability: Detailed Comparison

Repairs and Maintenance Cost
More durable
Excellent engine
Excellent engine
Gas Mileage
Excellent mileage
Excellent mileage
Better technology
Good technology

Which Is the Best Car: Mazda or Mitsubishi?

In the dynamic world of automobiles, selecting the finest car can be daunting, necessitating a comprehensive examination of various factors.

This dissertation delves into two distinguished Japanese automakers, Mazda and Mitsubishi, to determine which behemoths offer the ultimate driving experience.

Mazda is a reputable car manufacturer renowned for producing aesthetically appealing and innovative cars that provide an exhilarating and dynamic driving experience.

This has been achieved through the pioneering Skyactiv Technology that fuses cutting-edge engineering and design techniques to create fuel-efficient vehicles that offer a thrilling ride.

Mitsubishi's cars are engineered to last. Their performance is typically described as steady and consistent, making them popular for drivers who prioritize practicality and durability.

Mazda vs. Mitsubishi Reliability: Design

In the competitive world of automobiles, Mazda and Mitsubishi are two renowned Japanese car manufacturers known for their exceptional engineering and design.

Mazda stands out for its precision engineering and sophisticated design, evident in its sleek, aerodynamic curves and high-performance engines.

This makes it a popular choice among drivers who prioritize speed and agility on the road.

Moreover, Mazda's steadfast dedication to eco-friendly production solidifies its standing as a cutting-edge and trailblazing marque in the automotive sector.

Conversely, Mitsubishi's stylistic doctrine revolves around resilience and resourcefulness, which they consider being fundamental constituents of the unparalleled Mitsubishi ambiance.

Their focus on generosity and providing an empowering driving experience makes them a popular choice for drivers.

Mitsubishi's innovative solutions and design details anticipate unexpected needs, stimulating the imagination and exceeding expectations.

Winner: Both

Mazda vs. Mitsubishi Reliability: Repair and Maintenance Cost

Regarding the cost of maintenance and repair, Mazda and Mitsubishi have unique advantages and drawbacks.

Mazda models have a more moderate maintenance and repair cost, with an average cost of $8,035 during their first ten years of service.

Although this cost is $1,221 more than the industry average for famous brands, it still presents a more manageable financial burden for buyers.

Additionally, the likelihood of a Mazda requiring significant repair during that time is 18.43%, which is within the reasonable range for car models.

On the other hand, Mitsubishi has a lower average cost of ownership, with an intermediate maintenance and repair cost of $7,787 over ten years.

While the likelihood of significant repair is slightly better at 18.18%, it's important to note that Mazda and Mitsubishi rates are still higher than the industry average for renowned brands.

Winner: Mitsubishi

Mazda vs. Mitsubishi Reliability: Durability

In terms of durability, both Mazda and Mitsubishi have distinct approaches that have yielded favorable results. Mazda has taken a different route by prioritizing advanced research and development to create reliable, long-lasting models.

Through their cutting-edge engineering, attention to detail, and utilization of high-tech materials, Mazda has gained a significant advantage in durability, delivering vehicles that stand the test of time.

On the other hand, Mitsubishi has established a strong reliability rating of 4.0 out of 5.0 from RepairPal, ranking it sixth out of 32 car brands based on an average of 345 unique models.

Although Mitsubishi may not produce the longest-lasting vehicles, they are known for manufacturing cars that do not require excessive maintenance and repairs, making them a reliable choice for everyday driving.

While Mazda and Mitsubishi have unique advantages, Mazda's commitment to advanced engineering and high-tech materials has given it a distinct advantage in producing durable vehicles.

Winner: Mazda

Mazda vs. Mitsubishi Reliability: Engine

Mazda's Skyactiv-G engines are a testament to the brand's commitment to excellence in engineering and environmental sustainability.

Their use of advanced materials and technology results in a highly efficient engine that doesn't compromise power or performance.

In contrast, the four-cylinder turbocharged engine of Mitsubishi exudes remarkable force with its formidable production of 295 horsepower and 310 lb-ft of torque.

This engine's lightweight design provides a responsive and agile driving experience that will delight those prioritizing maneuverability and handling.

Ultimately, whether it's Mazda's focus on efficiency and sustainability or Mitsubishi's emphasis on power and agility, both automakers have something unique regarding engine design. The choice between the two ultimately depends on individual driving preferences and priorities.

Winner: Both

Mazda vs. Mitsubishi Reliability: Gas Mileage

Mazda and Mitsubishi have significantly enhanced fuel efficiency, manifesting their devotion to sustainability and inventiveness.

Mazda has emphasized enhancing engine technology and streamlining vehicle design to optimize fuel economy, resulting in an array of fuel-efficient vehicles that offer a stimulating driving experience.

Conversely, Mitsubishi's fuel efficiency is mainly attributed to its lightweight construction and groundbreaking regenerative braking system, which captures the energy typically lost during braking, thus further minimizing fuel consumption.

Mazda and Mitsubishi have triumphed in producing automobiles that provide remarkable fuel economy ratings, rendering them an alluring choice for environmentally aware drivers.

Winner: Both

Mazda vs. Mitsubishi Reliability: Technology

Mazda's MyMazda App and Connected Services offer advanced remote access features, including remote engine start, vehicle status reports, and emergency service access.

Moreover, Mazda's cutting-edge in-vehicle Wi-Fi and amusement amenities, such as the incorporation of Apple CarPlay and Android Auto and a 10-speaker Bose sound system, distinguish it as the unequivocal leader in connectivity and entertainment.

In contrast, Mitsubishi's visionary strides in electric vehicle (EV) technology are evidenced by models like the i-MiEV and Minicab-MiEV, aimed at facilitating urban commuting.

However, the limited driving range and lack of charging infrastructure present significant obstacles to broader adoption.

In terms of driver assistance, Mitsubishi's MI-PILOT is a same-lane driver-assistance system designed for motorways, reducing fatigue from extended periods of acceleration and steering.

Winner: Mazda

Mazda vs. Mitsubishi Reliability: Safety

Mazda and Mitsubishi are dedicated to creating safe cars with advanced safety features.

Mazda's i-Activsense®2 safety technology, including Smart City Brake Support with Pedestrian Detection and Traffic Jam Assist, demonstrates their commitment to safety.

Additionally, their 2022 IIHS Top Safety Pick+ award and 5-star overall safety rating attest to their safety focus.

Mitsubishi's reinforced impact safety evolution (RISE) body construction, front pedestrian impact crumple zones, and advanced safety features such as adaptive cruise control and forward collision mitigation work together to minimize damage and prevent accidents.

Overall, while both automakers have impressive safety features, Mazda's accolades in safety ratings and cutting-edge safety technologies give them a slight edge in safety.

Winner: Mazda

Final Verdict

Mazda and Mitsubishi offer a range of impressive features and technologies that cater to different needs and preferences.

And as evidenced by the article, Mazda is the winner regarding Mazda vs. Mitsubishi reliability.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which brand has better reliability, Mazda or Mitsubishi?

Mazda and Mitsubishi have strong reliability ratings, but Mazda ranks higher in overall reliability, according to RepairPal and J.D. Power. However, individual models and their maintenance histories should be considered when evaluating reliability.

Do Mazda and Mitsubishi offer long-lasting vehicles?

Mazda has a reputation for producing long-lasting vehicles thanks to its advanced research and development, cutting-edge engineering, and utilization of high-tech materials. While Mitsubishi may not produce the longest-lasting vehicles, they are known for manufacturing cars that do not require excessive maintenance and repairs, making them a reliable choice for everyday driving.

How do Mazda and Mitsubishi engines compare in terms of efficiency and power?

Mazda has focused on developing highly efficient engines and lightweight, aerodynamic designs. In contrast, Mitsubishi's engines are known for their compact size and powerful output. Both brands have strengths and advantages depending on what the driver looks for in a car.

Which brand offers better safety features, Mazda or Mitsubishi?

Mazda and Mitsubishi take safety seriously and have implemented various safety features to protect passengers. Mazda's i-Activsense®2 safety technology offers features like Smart City Brake Support with Pedestrian Detection and Traffic Jam Assist. At the same time, Mitsubishi cars are equipped with reinforced impact safety evolution (RISE) body construction, et cetera.