Chrysler vs. Mitsubishi Reliability

Chrysler vs Mitsubishi Reliability

With Ford and General Motors, Chrysler is among the "big three" American automobile manufacturers that reign supreme over the US market.

Renowned for its harmoniously designed minivans such as the Pacifica, Pacifica Hybrid, and Voyager, Chrysler has solidified its position as a ubiquitous household name in American automotive.

Meanwhile, Mitsubishi, which means "three diamonds" in Japanese, has made a name for itself around the globe with its value-focused automobiles and rally heritage.

Although founded in different countries and catering to different markets, both brands have carved out a significant place in the automotive industry.

However, when it comes to reliability, the two brands differ. Although Chrysler's reliability rating stands at 3.5/5.0, positioning it at the 11th spot out of 32 car brands, Mitsubishi, on the other hand, flaunts a score of 4.0/5.0, securing a higher rank of sixth among the same brands.

This article will cover the Chrysler vs. Mitsubishi reliability and elucidate the underlying factors contributing to these brands' disparate performance.

Chrysler vs. Mitsubishi Reliability: Detailed Comparison

More beautiful
Repairs and Maintenance Cost
Costlier to repair and maintain
Cheaper to repair and maintain
The Chrysler is more durable.
The Mitsubishi is durable.
A good engine
A better engine
Gas Mileage
A poor gas mileage
A better gas mileage
Better technological features
Good technological features
A safe car
It’s safer.

Which Is the Best Car: Chrysler or Mitsubishi?

The age-old debate of which car is superior - Chrysler or Mitsubishi - continues to stir the automotive industry.

Both brands have carved a place in the market with their distinctive features and reliable performance. However, a closer inspection is likely to reveal a clear winner.

With its rally heritage and value-focused automobiles, Mitsubishi has long been known for its exceptional reliability.

In terms of performance, Mitsubishi's vehicles offer better fuel efficiency and handling. The brand's advanced technology and engineering prowess make it popular among car enthusiasts.

Meanwhile, Chrysler is known for its well-balanced minivans, such as the Pacifica, Pacifica Hybrid, and Voyager. These vehicles boast spacious interiors and exceptional comfort, making them popular among families.

1. Chrysler vs. Mitsubishi Reliability: Design

Chrysler's design philosophy is renowned for its contemporary and daring aesthetic, characterized by fluid lines and striking accents that exude visual drama, which resonates with consumers seeking a cutting-edge appearance.

However, Mitsubishi's design ethos is centered on an empowering and generous spirit that aims to provide customers with an immersive experience that amplifies possibilities and invites them to embark on new adventures confidently.

With its innovative craftsmanship and outside-the-box design thinking, Mitsubishi creates form and function that stimulates the imagination and anticipate unexpected needs, making it the clear winner in design and innovation.

Winner: Mitsubishi

2. Chrysler vs. Mitsubishi Reliability: Repair and Maintenance Cost

The figures paint a different picture when it comes to the maintenance and repair costs of the Chrysler and Mitsubishi models.

Chrysler's average maintenance and repair cost over ten years of service is roughly $11,364.

This is $4,550 higher than the industry average for leading brands. With a 26.04% probability of requiring a significant repair during this period, Chrysler needs to improve in terms of reliability.

Conversely, Mitsubishi offers a lower average cost of ownership, with an intermediate maintenance and repair cost of $7,787 over ten years.

Although the likelihood of a significant repair is slightly better at 18.18%, it's important to note that both rates remain higher than the industry average for famous brands.

So, while both brands have their strengths and weaknesses, Mitsubishi emerges as the victor with its lower cost of ownership and better reliability.

Winner: Mitsubishi

3. Chrysler vs. Mitsubishi Reliability: Durability

In terms of vehicle longevity, Chrysler and Mitsubishi have distinctive characteristics. On average, Chrysler automobiles often exceed 210,000 to 240,000 miles, with the 200 being the most durable model, capable of withstanding up to 260,000 miles.

The Chrysler Crossfire can get up to 160,000 miles. However, with proper maintenance, the 300 sedans can surpass the 100,000-mile mark and even exceed the 200,000-mile threshold, making it a remarkably long-lasting model.

In comparison, Mitsubishi cars can last 150,000 to 200,000 miles or 10 to 13 years, but issues may arise after hitting 100,000 miles.

The Mitsubishi Outlander has a lifespan of 13 to 17 years and can last well over 250,000 miles.

With regular maintenance and responsible driving, the Mitsubishi Lancer is a relatively dependable car lasting between 150,000 and 200,000 miles.

Winner: Chrysler

4. Chrysler vs. Mitsubishi Reliability: Engine

The Chrysler 300S V8 showcases a commanding 5.7L HEMI® V8 engine that generates substantial horsepower and torque, offering an enthralling driving encounter bound to make a lasting impression.

Its Sport Mode feature comes standard, enabling drivers to fine-tune their driving experience, producing a refined and sporty ride that will captivate.

Mitsubishi's four-cylinder turbocharged engine is a small yet potent force to be reckoned with. Its 295 horsepower output is complemented by an exceptional 310 lb-ft of torque, making it a daunting competitor in any automotive arena.

The engine's lightweight design affords it an agile and supple feel on the road, which is perfect for those who value handling and maneuverability.

Winner: Mitsubishi

5. Chrysler vs. Mitsubishi Reliability: Gas Mileage

Chrysler models have been criticized due to their lackluster gas mileage, as their vehicles consume more fuel than the industry standard.

For example, the 2022 Chrysler 300S V8, equipped with a potent 5.7L HEMI® V8 engine, achieves a fuel economy rating of approximately 16 miles per gallon in the city and 25 miles per gallon on the highway, which is inferior to its peers.

In contrast, Mitsubishi models offer exceptional fuel efficiency that will impress, with an excellent rating of 25 miles per gallon in the city and 30 miles per gallon on the highway.

This unparalleled fuel economy results from the car's lightweight structure, which reduces weight and improves fuel efficiency.

Additionally, Mitsubishi's regenerative braking system captures energy that would typically be lost during braking and routes it to the vehicle battery, providing an extra boost to fuel economy.

Winner: Mitsubishi

6. Chrysler vs. Mitsubishi Reliability: Technology

Chrysler offers advanced technological features to keep drivers connected and entertained during long trips.

Uconnect® 4C and Uconnect 4C NAV systems and integrated Voice Command, Wireless Connectivity, and SiriusXM provide easy access to your favorite navigation, communication, and streaming apps.

Moreover, Android Auto compatibility, a 4G Wi-Fi Hotspot, and SiriusXM Guardian™ contribute to the seamless experience.

In contrast, Mitsubishi has developed the AWC (All-Wheel Control) concept to enhance dynamics control and balance and optimize all four tires for precise handling and superior stability.

AWC delivers precise handling, ensuring the car responds to the driver's intent in all situations. At the same time, superior stability maintains the vehicle's stability in all conditions, providing drivers with confidence.

Additionally, Mitsubishi's MI-PILOT technology is a same-lane driver-assistance system designed for motorways, enabling drivers to travel long distances or at set speeds in congested traffic and highways, reducing fatigue from operating acceleration and steering for extended periods.

It also mitigates fatigue from frequent stopping and starting during traffic congestion or similar scenarios.

Regarding technology, Chrysler offers more features, including a comprehensive entertainment system. At the same time, Mitsubishi focuses on enhancing driving dynamics and safety through innovative systems such as AWC and MI-PILOT.

Winner: Chrysler

7. Chrysler vs. Mitsubishi Reliability: Safety

Chrysler's safety features, such as Full-Speed Forward Collision Warning with Active Braking, Adaptive Cruise Control with Stop and Go, and LaneSense Lane Departure Warning with Lane Keep Assist, can help drivers avoid collisions and protect their passengers.

Meanwhile, Mitsubishi Motors vehicles feature reinforced impact safety evolution (RISE) body construction to absorb energy and protect passengers in the event of a collision.

Additionally, the cars have front pedestrian impact crumple zones to minimize pedestrian injuries.

To enhance driver control, Mitsubishi offers active stability control (ASC), an anti-lock braking system (ABS), and traction control logic (TLC).

Advanced safety features, including adaptive cruise control, forward collision mitigation, and lane departure warning, work together to prevent accidents or reduce their impact.

Winner: Mitsubishi

Final Verdict

Chrysler vehicles offer powerful engines and advanced technology features, while Mitsubishi models excel in fuel efficiency and safety features.

Both brands have unique strengths and cater to car buyers' different needs and preferences.

Based on the categories covered in this Chrysler vs. Mitsubishi reliability piece, Mitsubishi is more reliable than Chrysler.